CURRENT UNIT/LESSON PLANNING
When comparing my planner with the UDL format I find lots of differences that make me reflect about the chances that I might be missing as a teacher to create a lesson that is really effective to all students. With the current format I am only focusing on the activity and the main goal of it but I am not anticipating possible needs of students.
The only similarity that I find is that in my current format I leave the space for observations, where I usually write what I found positive or negative and that I would change for the next time. It gives me the possibility to self reflect on how the activity went and what modifications I can do for it to work better in the groups I am going to applied it. However it is to vague and the UDL format will structure this reflexion even more.
Another difference is that I don´t discriminate my actions vs the students actions this would give a good inside of how would I and the activity guide the students to take the skill and use it.
The potential barrier which a good analysis to make before the class so you can come up with ideas that might eliminated and avoid wasting the time during the class trying to overcome it and improvise.
Finally how the UDL planner analysis the multiple means of engagement of representation, engagement and expression which is the main way to be able to plan and execute an effective learning experience.
Even though my classes are a different because they work on skills rather than knowledge or concepts I can still modify my planner to maximize my classes.
.jpeg)

Comentarios
Publicar un comentario